Space exploration captures our imagination with rockets and red landscapes, but the biological reality of leaving Earth is far more complex. A groundbreaking study published in Nature Communications has identified a critical health barrier for deep space travel. Researchers have found that the conditions necessary for a trip to Mars could cause irreversible damage to astronaut kidneys, potentially turning a triumphant mission into a medical emergency.
For decades, NASA and other space agencies focused heavily on bone density loss and muscle atrophy in zero gravity. While researchers knew spaceflight altered the body, the kidneys were largely overlooked until recently. A team led by researchers from University College London (UCL) conducted the most comprehensive analysis to date regarding kidney health in space.
This study did not rely on a single dataset. Instead, the team pooled physiological data from over 40 space missions involving humans and mice. They also performed advanced simulations to mimic the effects of deep space radiation.
The findings were stark. The study suggests that the structure of the kidney changes rapidly in space. Within less than a month in microgravity, the kidneys begin to remodel themselves. While microgravity initiates these changes, the true danger lies in the radiation exposure associated with leaving Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
The primary culprit identified in the study is Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCR). On Earth, and even on the International Space Station (ISS), the planet’s magnetosphere provides a protective shield against this high-energy radiation. Once astronauts travel beyond this magnetic bubble to head toward Mars, that protection vanishes.
The UCL researchers exposed mice to simulated GCR doses equivalent to a 2.5-year round trip to Mars. The results showed permanent damage to the renal tissue. Specifically, the radiation attacked the mitochondria in kidney cells, which are responsible for energy production. This damage caused a ripple effect, leading to a buildup of proteins and a breakdown in the kidney’s ability to filter waste.
The study highlighted damage to the distal convoluted tubule. This is a microscopic structure within the kidney responsible for regulating salt and water balance. When this structure is compromised by radiation, the kidney cannot properly recycle salt.
This leads to two major issues:
The implications of this study are logistical as well as biological. A typical mission to Mars involves a six to nine-month flight, a stay on the surface, and a return flight. The total mission duration is expected to be between two and three years.
According to Dr. Keith Siew, the study’s first author from the tubular physiology and renal medicine experts at UCL, astronauts might technically survive the flight to Mars. However, by the time they began the return journey, their kidneys could be in late-stage failure.
This presents a fatal problem. Treating kidney failure requires dialysis. On Earth, dialysis is a resource-intensive process. It requires:
Putting a dialysis machine on a spacecraft like SpaceX’s Starship is theoretically possible, but the water requirements alone make it impractical. Furthermore, relying on life-support machinery for a year-long return trip introduces unacceptable mission risks. If the machine breaks, the astronaut dies.
Long before total organ failure sets in, astronauts face the painful and dangerous risk of kidney stones. This issue has been known since the Apollo era, but the new study sheds light on why it is so persistent.
In microgravity, bones demineralize. They release calcium into the bloodstream, which the kidneys must then filter out. The new research indicates that the radiation-induced damage to the renal tubules makes it even harder for the kidneys to process this excess calcium.
The combination of high calcium levels and compromised processing ability creates a perfect environment for stone formation. A kidney stone passing during a critical maneuver or a spacewalk could incapacitate an astronaut, putting the entire crew at risk.
The study concludes that shielding alone will not be enough. The type of radiation encountered in deep space penetrates most current spacecraft materials. Increasing shielding adds weight, which increases fuel costs and launch difficulty.
Instead, the scientific community is shifting focus toward biological countermeasures. The goal is to develop pharmaceutical interventions that can protect the kidneys at a cellular level.
Possible avenues of research include:
While these solutions are in development, none are currently ready for a Mars mission. The UCL study serves as a warning flag that biology, not just rocket engineering, is the current bottleneck for interplanetary travel.
Is it safe for astronauts to stay on the ISS? Yes. The International Space Station orbits within Earth’s magnetosphere. While radiation levels are higher than on the ground, they are significantly lower than deep space. Astronauts on the ISS are generally safe from the severe GCR damage described in the Mars study.
Did the Apollo astronauts suffer kidney damage? The Apollo missions to the Moon were short, typically lasting only days (e.g., Apollo 11 was roughly 8 days). The exposure time to deep space radiation was too brief to cause the chronic, long-term kidney remodeling seen in the 2.5-year simulations.
Can we just add more water to the ship for dialysis? Water is incredibly heavy (1 kilogram per liter). A dialysis patient requires huge volumes of dialysate fluid. Carrying enough sterile fluid for months of treatment would likely make the spacecraft too heavy to launch or reduce the payload capacity for food and fuel.
Are there drugs to prevent this? Not yet. While we have drugs for kidney disease on Earth, they are not designed to stop radiation damage. Scientists are currently using the data from this study to identify drug targets that could prevent the tubular damage before it begins.